Skip navigation

Tag Archives: epistemology

A few weeks ago someone posted on hacker news an (oldish) long rant by a certain Steven Dutch against the weasel wording of post-modern philosophy of science.

For a physicist, being called solipsist is tantamount to being accused of inventing his experimental results, pretty much the worst thing one could do. For anyone in the humanities, people being their object of study, and people having a strong tendency to behave in solipsist ways, disregarding solipsism out of hand is inventing experimental results. Read More »

A primate brain, say a chimp’s or a bonobo’s grey matter, sees the world in monkey terms. That is to say, it first and foremost is part of a band of other monkeys, it tries to figure out who’s boss and who’s to be exploited, who is enemy, who controls the food, etc. Mostly it is all about «who»s. Inside the head, it is a lot of monkeys. Primates are social animals and the pecking order is way more important than anything else. The same brain also helps with spacial navigation, cause-and-effect modelling, literature criticism and so on, but those are side-effects.

But the thing is: Those side effects turn out quite impressive. So: How, exactly?

Science, Art, Pornography, Philosophy, J-Pop, Mathematics, Culinary, Religions, Traffic Jam, Po-Mo, Bureaucracy, 4chan — all of those (and many others) are one way or another a product of human brain activity. Now if all brain activity is monkey business, if all the brain does is deal with the politics of ape packs, then how exactly do we understand all of those things? Read More »

To think is an action. It is something that is done, something that happens through effort by someone or something.

Nevertheless, sometimes thinking can appear as a thing.

A morsel of thinking becomes an idea. There seems to be no action in an idea, no performance, nothing happening but a simple finished contained thing that exists independently. That is an illusion, and it can originate a slew of weird mistakes. Read More »

Um cérebro de macaco interpreta o mundo como macaquice. Isso significa que esse cérebro é primariamente uma peça de um quebra-cabeças que é um bando de macacos, e esse cérebro serve para descobrir quem é o chefão, quem é o otário, quem é inimigo, quem administra a comida, e assim por diante. Basicamente, uma série de «Quems». Dentro da cabeça, é um monte de macacos. Primatas são animais sociais e pra esse tipo de animal nada é mais importante que a hierarquia social. O mesmo cérebro também se encarrega de orientação espacial, dos modelos de causa-e-efeito, da crítica literária e assim por diante, mas isso tudo é secundário.

Essas outras coisas secundárias podem ser impressionantes, o que levanta a questão: “¿Como?”

A ciência, a arte, a pornografia, o K-Pop, a matemática, a culinária, as religiões, os engarrafamentos, o póstransmetamodernismo, a Burocracia, o SilkRoad7 — tudo isso (e muito mais) saiu de um cérebro de humano. Mas se o ser humano é um macaco e cérebros de macaco lidam primariamente com macaquices, se o cérebro de macaco é uma ferramenta especializada na política dos bandos de macacos, como é que todas essas outras coisas vêm à tona? Read More »