Skip navigation

Tag Archives: epistemology

A primate brain, say a chimp’s or a bonobo’s grey matter, sees the world in monkey terms. That is to say, it first and foremost is part of a band of other monkeys, it tries to figure out who’s boss and who’s to be exploited, who is enemy, who controls the food, etc. Mostly it is all about «who»s. Inside the head, it is a lot of monkeys. Primates are social animals and the pecking order is way more important than anything else. The same brain also helps with spacial navigation, cause-and-effect modelling, literature criticism and so on, but those are side-effects.

But the thing is: Those side effects turn out quite impressive. So: How, exactly?

Science, Art, Pornography, Philosophy, J-Pop, Mathematics, Culinary, Religions, Traffic Jam, Po-Mo, Bureaucracy, 4chan — all of those (and many others) are one way or another a product of human brain activity. Now if all brain activity is monkey business, if all the brain does is deal with the politics of ape packs, then how exactly do we understand all of those things? Read More »

To think is an action. It is something that is done, something that happens through effort by someone or something.

Nevertheless, sometimes thinking can appear as a thing.

A morsel of thinking becomes an idea. There seems to be no action in an idea, no performance, nothing happening but a simple finished contained thing that exists independently. That is an illusion, and it can originate a slew of weird mistakes. Read More »

Um cérebro de macaco interpreta o mundo como macaquice. Isso significa que esse cérebro é primariamente uma peça de um quebra-cabeças que é um bando de macacos, e esse cérebro serve para descobrir quem é o chefão, quem é o otário, quem é inimigo, quem administra a comida, e assim por diante. Basicamente, uma série de «Quems». Dentro da cabeça, é um monte de macacos. Primatas são animais sociais e pra esse tipo de animal nada é mais importante que a hierarquia social. O mesmo cérebro também se encarrega de orientação espacial, dos modelos de causa-e-efeito, da crítica literária e assim por diante, mas isso tudo é secundário.

Essas outras coisas secundárias podem ser impressionantes, o que levanta a questão: “¿Como?”

A ciência, a arte, a pornografia, o K-Pop, a matemática, a culinária, as religiões, os engarrafamentos, o póstransmetamodernismo, a Burocracia, o SilkRoad7 — tudo isso (e muito mais) saiu de um cérebro de humano. Mas se o ser humano é um macaco e cérebros de macaco lidam primariamente com macaquices, se o cérebro de macaco é uma ferramenta especializada na política dos bandos de macacos, como é que todas essas outras coisas vêm à tona? Read More »

Design is concerned with how it works, and therefore, not so much with what is and what truly is (or truth).

So we can turn this concern on itself and ask: How does design work?

One answer to this question is a whole field of knowledge, namely “design methodology”, but we can find a rougher answer (and therefore more abstract) if we point out that the question itself is an application of design! We want to create stuff (not make stuff, there is a difference) and in order to do that we begin to concern ourselves with how stuff behaves when it is joined with other stuff. Read More »


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 128 other followers