Skip navigation

Paz & Gorm & Oliver & some other friends are all perplexed about mathematics. They think it is huge, and so important that all philosophy should just conform itself to Maths. The problem is, while they know that any data or knowledge can at best be an approximation and a simplification and a relative truth, they misteriously miss the relativeness of Maths. And it is a shame, too, that they are perplexed, because Maths is such a simple, solved issue.

Gödel’s incompleteness theorem is a correct, bizantine, mathematical proof that Mathematics is as not-true as any other human knowledge.

But even demanding such a proof is a mistake.

That is so because Mathematics is defined amongst other things by this functional definition that anything that disproves Math we call non-mathematical. So for example if i pour a 2 liter bucket of water into another filled 2 liter bucket, we just call the whole bucket stuff non-mathematical and keep 2+2=4.

And they miss that if you demand me to punch your face without actual physical contact, you could even prove that i can’t punch you, but that would make no difference to my real-world power to punch your face. Damn i could even use a glove.

Demanding mathematical proof of the relativeness of Maths is like demanding me to show it is not true without showing it false. Dumb.

And some even say that this proves the truth of Maths.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: